Нужно перевести текст правильно и досконально на (или было бы еще лучше на казахский язык) ancient philosophy by anthony john patrick kenny is the first in a four part collection on the progression of western philosophy. this entry covers the span of major philosophical inquiry from the
pre-socratics to the pre-christian augustine. it starts off with the first two chapters chronologically covering the general concepts of the major philosophical players. the next seven chapters each cover a specific aspect of philosophy and the arguments that contributed to each field, including:
logic, epistemology, physics, metaphysics, the study of the soul and mind, and god.if you buy this hoping for a quick and easy intro to the names, lives and thoughts of early greek philosophers, you're going to feel let down. the author seems to think that she's got more important things in mind
than organizing and running the essential facts by you. she wants you to wonder about the usual tedious gender/power/class "issues," how perceptions of the greeks have changed over time, what it all does or doesn't mean to us, and much else i could have lived without. and then she subjects you to
pages of "now, class, what do you think? "-style discussions. questions for author: how is a reader supposed to have deep or searching thoughts about a field before knowing anything about that field? and: isn't this book meant to be an introduction? by the way, teacher's own deep and searching
thoughts didn't impress. all in all, like a day spent at a bad progressive school.

00012333334    2   08.10.2019 05:30    0