«Pluses» of the foreign experience: mobility (in many countries of Eastern and Western Europe go to a patient in 10 minutes), to respond quickly on almost every street corner there are points of emergency assistance; provision with modern equipment, that allows to render qualified assistance at the pre-hospital stage; the personnel question (personnel shortage and works at a high level), the financial provision in full volume.
Our «cons»: inertia (because of the inconvenient location of the fast: at 1 station in 10-15 cars, for a long time to respond to the «call» and come on time) lack of appropriate equipment (mainly can help only in a hospital); human resources (specialists enough and their quality is not always corresponds to the desired) is extremely insufficient funding.
«Pluses» of the foreign experience: mobility (in many countries of Eastern and Western Europe go to a patient in 10 minutes), to respond quickly on almost every street corner there are points of emergency assistance; provision with modern equipment, that allows to render qualified assistance at the pre-hospital stage; the personnel question (personnel shortage and works at a high level), the financial provision in full volume.
Our «cons»: inertia (because of the inconvenient location of the fast: at 1 station in 10-15 cars, for a long time to respond to the «call» and come on time) lack of appropriate equipment (mainly can help only in a hospital); human resources (specialists enough and their quality is not always corresponds to the desired) is extremely insufficient funding.